Thank you, Mr. Hartmann, for arguing my point

Byline: | Category: 2nd Amendment | Posted at: Thursday, 17 January 2013

Thom Hartmann argues that the Second Amendment is a vestige of slave-holding days:

The real reason the Second Amendment was ratified, and why it says “State” instead of “Country” (the Framers knew the difference – see the 10th Amendment), was to preserve the slave patrol militias in the southern states

He’s cherry-picking.  But, okay, I’ll play his game.  Let’s stipulate that Mr. Hartmann is correct and that the Second Amendment was designed by Southerners to prevent the possibility of armed slave insurrections.

Okay, but if that’s going to be your position, then you must recognize that the Constitution also specifically treated slaves as non citizens, and thus, the Second Amendment offered slaves no Second Amendment rights.  And who was hurt by that most?

Yes, that’s right, those who were legally prohibited from owning guns were powerless to resist their own government’s laws that were used to oppress them.

Thank you, Thom Hartmann, for so eloquently pointing out that our own nation’s history shows examples of the evil that can befall individuals at the hands of the government when they are denied Second Amendment rights.

Share this post:

Comments are closed.