Kind Of Crazy, But It Just Might Work

Byline: | Category: Uncategorized | Posted at: Thursday, 3 May 2007

Against the establishment of “hate crimes”? Really? Great. I’m with you there Mr. President.

Oh wait, you mean just in the cases of gays. You’re evidently cool with the other kinds, to wit:

The Administration favors strong criminal penalties for violent crime, including crime based on personal characteristics, such as race, color, religion, or national origin. However, the Administration believes that H.R. 1592 is unnecessary and constitutionally questionable. If H.R. 1592 were presented to the President, his senior advisors would recommend that he veto the bill.

Here’s a thought: instead of yet again beating the anti-homo drum, why not get rid of all the federal “hate crime” laws? Why so selective? (Yes, for anyone tempted to chime in here, I know the real reason.)

UPDATE: Sullivan notes a few extra tidbits of info, noted by others. See especially Ponnuru, taking a more charitable view toward the administration’s position, observing that it expands the reach of federal hate crimes for many classes of people far beyond where it is now. A fair point. But that doesn’t seem to be the reason organizations like Concerned Women for America are against it.

Share this post:

One Response to “Kind Of Crazy, But It Just Might Work”

  1. Appalachian Scribe » Hating on Hate Crime Legislation Says:

    […] other words, those who murder someone for a reason other than race deserve lighter sentences. Then Roger Abramson pointed out that Bush is generally in favor of federal “hate crimes” laws, just not […]